Viacom v. Youtube, Bryer v. Ginsburg

"The Viacom v. Google lawsuit over Youtube offers a very high-profile sequel to MGM v. Grokster. In particular, this case appears to pick up where the Grokster case left off: what is the nature of “inducement” to violate copyright laws. The court here will of necessity probe the question that Bryer and Ginsburg debated in their concurrences: how do you judge whether someone offering a particular product, technology or service is actively encouraging infringement and therefore subject to secondary liability for the copyright violations of others?" -- Read more

Yes, parent company of MTV is suing Google. The above Public Knowledge commentary compares the case with an earlier case of MGM vs. Grokster. It appears DMCA never was entirely clear on some things and these lawsuits turn into long and painful debates over... well.. nothing, because the whole issue is just pointless, the very concept of someone being guilty for "inducement".