microsoft
Is .NET on GNU/Linux a Trojan Horse?
Submitted by libervisco on Tue, 2007-09-11 00:17. .net microsoft mono novell"Don't talk about Microsoft" is a meme some people would gladly adopt for it is true that many in the Free Software community often appear obsessed with what Microsoft does and how could that be a part of a plan to hurt Free Software and GNU/Linux specifically. However, there are certain facts that can't be validly denied; Microsoft has a reputation of being quite a devious "competitor", if we can even fairly attribute such a noble term to them. They simply shown that they will use every trick in the book, regardless even of legality or ethics, to stay on the top. It is not the only company that finds it in their interest to bury the Free Software revolution, but it is the most prominent and probably the most capable one.
Microsoft is not the boss, we are
Submitted by libervisco on Wed, 2007-05-09 18:02. linux microsoft
After celebrations over Dell announcing that it will soon be selling GNU/Linux Ubuntu desktops and laptops we are seeing a bit of an uproar after, just a week later, Microsoft announced it's partnership with Dell akin to the one it made with Novell last November.
It is interesting how some people are equating this move to Microsoft showing us who is the boss in the industry. It is being said Microsoft *allowed* Dell to start selling Ubuntu under the condition that it also sells Novell SuSE GNU/Linux. I suppose the reason why Microsoft may care so much for pushing Novell sales is because this is where they are asserting their supposed patent rights. The stronger Novell's version of GNU/Linux is, the more people will, in some way, be admitting to Microsoft's patent rights, even if unwillingly. In fact even Novell isn't willing to admit that GNU/Linux contains any of the Microsoft patented code, but as long as the deal between them is valid, Microsoft can and will make such claims and spread fear, uncertainty and doubt on this basis.
MSXML Is Not an Open Standard
Submitted by libervisco on Wed, 2006-12-13 03:08. microsoft msxml open document open standardsECMA has approved Microsofts Office OpenXML and is about to submit it to the ISO/IEC for consideration as an open standard.
However, as it currently stands, this format cannot be considered a proper Open Standard and approving it for standardization is therefore a bad idea. ODF Alliance has issued a facts sheet stating certain points which describe the ECMA process and reasons why OpenXML can hardly be considered an Open Standard.
On December 7, 2006, Ecma approved Office Open XML (OOXML) and plans to submit it to the Joint
Technical Committee 1 of the International Organization for Standardization and International
Electrotechnical Commission (ISO/IEC JTC1), triggering a 9-12 month process during which



