RIAA lawsuits debate

There is an interesting article here: RIAA Critics, and their Critics, Debate Lawsuits

Quoting:

The article goes on explaining three sorts of arguments presented against RIAA lawsuits.

Any person can believe any of these three arguments or any combination of them as also explained in the article:

The point is that it is often not clear as to which arguments are or aren't we making against RIAA lawsuits. There is a certain lack of coherence in our voice. This is why it is also much harder to propose an alternative, a solution to the problem we're facing.

I would actually argue with all of those three arguments because I don't think what RIAA and the industry is doing is neither morally, pragmatically nor empirically right. Morally it isn't right because RIAA itself is actually leeching off both individuals and artists. In the world of internet, RIAA is old and orphan because increasingly a middle man like them just isn't essential anymore. Artists have an ability to get to their listeners directly. What RIAA is doing is abusing both the listeners and artists for their own profit while doing no good for either. That is in my opinion immoral. Pragmatically, what RIAA is doing is at least in the long term self defeating because as they push further, they make more people angry, sooner or later it gotta smack them and their "sales" in the face. And empirical argument is just that, empirical. The most believeable science is based on empirical evidence, a proof you can point to and say that this has been prooven correct. There were studies showing that p2p actually doesn't draw sales down so much as RIAA would have it, so if empirical evidence kills their strongest argument (reduced sales), what's left?

In the end, they will be the ones causing the drop in sales which just fits in the picture described in this thread They could end up choking themselves.

So, all this said, what do you think would be the way to consolidate all of these arguments and somehow more coherently stand up in fight against what the industry led by RIAA (in US at least) is doing?
And are there any ideas of a solution to the "RIAA problem" that could ideally maybe even be willingly accepted by RIAA itself or alternatively force RIAA to accept it (in essence withdraw). How can we finally corner them and defeat this problem?

Thank you
Daniel