Today I would like to explain something that is important to understand: the difference between OpenOffice.org (OOo) and the OpenDocument Format (ODF).

OpenOffice.org is the name of the international free and open source office suite project that was started by Sun and that has now grown to the success we know.

The OpenDocument Format is a document format specification that is both open and standard, and that has been developed by many parties (including mainly Sun and the community) on the basis of the OpenOffice.org native file format by a Technical Committee of the OASIS Consortium.

OpenOffice.org in its 2.0 version uses the OpenDocument Format as its default, native format, but we are not the only office suite to implement it: StarOffice, KOffice, TextMaker, Corel WordPerfect, Abiword, do implement or plan to implement the format in a near future and have even participated in the ODF development for some.

In this regard, it is now easy to understand that the OpenOffice.org project has a different focus and even a different population than the OpenDocument Format TC (Technical Committee) of the OASIS consortium, or for that matter, the OpenDocument Fellowship, a private, independent group portraying itself as "the OpenDocument community" but who is not endorsed neither by the OASIS Consortium, neither by the OpenOffice.org project itself (although they act as if they were) and who does not participate in the OpenDocument Format developement.

In this regard, it is also easy to understand that the OpenOffice.org project has almost nothing to gain from a potential OpenDocument Format alliance or foundation. The OpenOffice.org project is at best a leading force behind ODF, and we do fundamentally support this format, but we are not the "OpenDocument folks". After all, if Corel, KOffice or TextMaker implement the ODF by default, we are not the same software (some are and will remain proprietary) and we're essentially competitors on the same market.

All in all, the OpenDocument Format induces a technological revolution that I will attempt to write about in the near future, but it also does create the necessary conditions for a truly free market environment. In this free market, OpenOffice.org is for the moment the leader, and is actively competing against the others.

Signing the petition of the OpenDocument Fellowship asking Microsoft to implement the ODF is hence not a move that the OpenOffice.org project can endorse: we don't want a new competitor (or more exactly, we don't want a competitor gaining the same technology that differentiates us) and do not want to bring in Microsoft for a very simple reason: OpenOffice.org is not a pressure group designed to make MSOffice open source. And the OpenDocument Format won't make MSOffice any less close than it is now, for you can use ODF as an open standard in a proprietary software.

I hope to have clear up some misunderstandings.

Well, our good friends at Corel finally realized how out of their depth they were and so went back on their last week's assertions about the OpenDocument Format.
That was not because of what I wrote by then , but I'd like to thank Gary Edwards for this:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=2056

The scope of libervis.com has grown quite a lot. First it was only about free software. Then came free culture. And in the next iteration, the slogan will be "for a free world". What's this Daniel, are we going to talk about ALL freedom? How much are we going to widen the scope this time?

If you carefully examine the newswire (the automated links to entries on other sites), you will see that apart from free culture, we care about things like free press and fair development/fair trade. I have to add that is the observation from someone who cares a lot about those things. Others might see we're a bunch of geeks who love new technology .

So, in my opinion, what libervis.com really is about (or what I would like it to be about) is creative freedom: free speech, free press, free information... Free information should be available to everyone, that means education should be available to everyone.

This creative freedom is the base for all other freedoms. If you're not allowed to learn, you will never know you're not free. If you do not have the right to speak, you can't even ask for a freedom, forget about ever getting it.

Software is just an example. If you never know it is even possible to study the source code of a program (like most users of proprietary software don't know), you will certainly not know you're missing the freedom to build upon that software.

Take a completely different example. If you don't get any fair education about politics, it is unlikely you will fully understand what democracy is, and you won't think you need it.
Without free press it's the same: no democracy.

If we work for creative freedom for everyone, that means we work for all freedoms for everyone, for a free world. Libervis.com doesn't need to widen it's scope any further than creative freedom.

In an earlier blog entry, I asked you (well, everyone and noone in particular) to use your creativity to promote free culture. I didn't get much of a response. Maybe now we realized how important creative freedom is, it will be different? I hope so, but now I ask for something else.

If you have a voice, please use it to bring a free world closer to reality. It doesn't have to be about creative freedom, any freedom will do. It doesn't matter what kind of "voice" you use: you can speak, you can write, draw, sculpt, play, sing, etc... or if you're a really hopeless consumerist, you can buy. No, I don't mean buy from the libervis support store (although I encourage that too), I mean that for example you can ask for a slave-free product next time you shop (fair trade is even better).
Oh... wait a minute. Is the libervis store slave/sweatshop free? I don't know. Is it?

Anyway. Yes I really said slave-free. Believe it or not, slavery still exists, in almost every country including the US and those in western Europe. More about that another time, when I use my voice .

For now, remember you have a voice, and you're supposed to use it.

Thank you,

Taco

OpenOffice.org 2.0 is here!
I'd like tot thank all the contributors, developpers, localizers, marketers, well, everybody who made this possible.



The complete press release and details are available here:
http://www.openoffice.org/press/2.0/index.html

To this day, the french builds are not available yet (but will be around the 24th of this month), and croatian ones for Windows and Linux should be ready at the end of october.

Enjoy!!!

Spotted on the OpenOffice.org News Channel (let's call it this way from now on) and here , the extraordinaire and magical interview from two managers of.... COREL ! (Yes! there are even two managers working at the same time at Corel on WordPerfect!)
Okay, let's close the fun time and move on. I read their interview and turned hilarious but also sad at Corel's comment.
According to them, OpenOffice.org is not serious a competitor because it lacks professional support (ever heard of local IT services companies providing support on OpenOffice.org? Of Sun? Of StarOffice?) and that it's open source, so, no, it's really not serious. Besides, I learned with a rather self-contained amount of amazement that Corel's office suite called WordPerfect has the second largest market share after Microsoft Office.
To be honest, I don't think we're talking about the same market, or maybe even the same world. These last years Corel managed to maintain some presence in the office market business amidst some serious financial troubles by striking some massive deals in the legal sector especially in North America, but nowhere higher than 50,000 seats were ever kept by the Canadian software vendor.
OpenOffice.org started truly in a worse position than Corel's WordPerfect, but managed to get much higher numbers thanks to its huge amount of localizations and the ever-growing number of its Native-Language communities coupled with the growth on Linux on the desktop. Even today, the usual comment one can hear about OpenOffice.org being that "office suite of Linux" is untrue. More than 50% (and certainly more now) of the downloads we keep track of were for the Windows platform 2 years ago.

But what really made me sad was the stance on OpenDocument. According to the Corel's spin doctors, it makes no sense to use or implement OpenDocument because although it is an open standard nobody has ever used. They're right if they consider the period of time starting with the invention of computers to the two last months. But not anymore today; true, we need a massive adoption of OpenDocument.
But did Corel realize that if they had adopted OpenDocument and implemented it in WordPerfect they would be THE single leading vendor behind OpenDocument?
Did they realize how big their benefit would have been? True, there would have been people who would have chosen OpenOffice.org over WordPerfect because it is free as in speech and beer, but their market share would have grown even higher.
The rationale behind this is simple: an office suite using standard and open file formats having a very small market share is more appealing to customers and investors than a proprietary office suite using closed formats and having just a little bigger market share. Closed formats can survive in a monopolistic market, not in a free market with FLOSS challengers.

All in all, I'm disappointed by Corel's reaction. Corel has been selling WordPerfect office, an office suite that was more advanced than any other contender for years and suffered from Microsoft's practices and monopoly to the point of almost disappearing from the surface of the earth. Now that they managed to get some cash and some sales, I thought they would have learned the lesson. Apparently not. Corel was in the OASIS Technical Committee who designed to OpenDocument file format, but never considered implementing it or in a very far future...maybe when OpenOffice.org would have eaten WordPerfect's own market share?

So long, Corel, you had some jewels, got ruined, and still didn't learn how to sell your very last ones in a smart way.
R.I.P

(official press release)
FIVE YEARS OF OPENOFFICE.ORG, MORE TO COME

13 October, 2005 - 1400 UTC

On this day, five years ago, the fledgling OpenOffice.org community
provided the first public access to the source code donated from
StarOffice by Sun Microsystems. The OpenOffice.org community had
recently been formed, and declared it's intent "to create, as a
community, the leading international office suite that will run on all
major platforms and provide access to all functionality and data". Since
then, the popularity and functionality of the OpenOffice.org office
productivity suite has grown exponentially and has had a major impact
not only in the greater Open Source community, but for all users of
office productivity software, worldwide.

The last five years have not only seen significant improvements in the
software, but also a notable growth in the community and a number of
organisational changes. These changes include the tremendous growth of
the Native Language Confederation, which now numbers thousands of
contributors, the establishment of a Community Council, and the
Engineering Steering Committee, both of which go a long way to improving
communication and transparency in one of the largest open-source
communities. OpenOffice.org developers and contributors number in the
thousands and they live in every part of the globe. From its early days
to now, OpenOffice.org has been international in scope and mission.

Significant contributions from many organisations including Novell, Red
Hat, Debian, Propylon, Intel and primary sponsor Sun Microsystems,
ensure the ongoing presence and support of OpenOffice.org. Independent
contributors also make a considerable impact in terms of code
development, marketing, translation, documentation and web presence.

The OpenOffice.org community looks forward to the continuing the
expansion, enhancement and innovation of technologies within the suite.

One thing is certain, there is more to come.

Thanks to all,

The OpenOffice.org Community



About OpenOffice.org
The OpenOffice.org Project is an international community of volunteers
and sponsors including founding sponsor and primary contributor, Sun
Microsystems. OpenOffice.org develops, supports, and promotes the
open-source office productivity suite, OpenOffice.org. The project can
be found at http://www.openoffice.org/. OpenOffice.org fully supports
the Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) OASIS
Standard and is available on major computing platforms in over 60 languages.

Global Marketing Contacts

Jacqueline McNally (UTC +08h00)
OpenOffice.org Marketing Project Lead
[email protected]
+61 (8) 9474-3021

John McCreesh (UTC +01h00)
OpenOffice.org Marketing Project Co-Lead
[email protected]
+44 (131) 523-9218

Louis Suarez-Potts
OpenOffice.org Community Manager
[email protected]
+1 (416) 625-3843

Copyright © 2005 - OpenOffice.org
---///---

Brought to you by your erratic and pompous servant, the news of the week:

-OOoCON 2005 is now over and I'd like to thank everybody in the Slovenian team (http://si.openoffice.org) and the Italian community (http://it.openoffice.org) for having made this conference a truly unique moment. Especially, I'd like to praise Urska Colner, Davide Dozza and Robert Ludvik for having managed to transform this event in a great feast of friends.
http://marketing.openoffice.org/conference
pics: http://www.kfacts.com/oocon2005/
my interview: http://ooocon-arnes.kiberpipa.org/media/index-day3.html (scroll down the page to find mine, of course, there are plenty of others)

-Microsoft Office 12 will include the PDF export features that OpenOffice.org and StarOffice had since the 1.1 ... Now, wait, Microsoft wouldn't be copying what we do, right? What if we had a patent about that feature? Nah, we in the FLOSS community are way too nice and gentle sometimes!
http://www.eweek.com/category2/0,1874,1866726,00.asp?kc=ewnws100405dtx1k0000599

-The Open Document format has now be declared unencumbered from any Sun's patents it may get into: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/office/ipr.php

-Google teams up with Sun in order to bring StarOffice to the masses, and on the Net... Welcome to StarOffice on demand: http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3553371

That's all for now, but that was a hell of a week, wasn't it?

Now this is too funny. And definitely, it's a great way to start the week!
I couldn't have written a better answer to this offer...

http://esr.ibiblio.org/index.208.html

I was in a rush these last days and I forgot to provide several news updates:

OpenOffice.org 2.0 beta 2 is released! Use it with caution, but above all, have fun!
(NB: for those under Debian, I'm available if you wish to test it and install it, as there are special instructions...)
OpenOffice.org will have its OOoCON in Koper/Capodistria, Slovenia, from the 28th to the 30th of september 2005!
More on all this here: www.openoffice.org

And in a move that will please many and solve some issues we had with license visibility and rogue distributors, OpenOffice.org will now only use the LGPL license, leaving aside the SISSL from Sun.
More on this topic here:
http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/license-change.html

Have a great week-end!

I used to use SCIM to write chinese characters. It didn't work perfectly, and only for gtk applications, and somehow it made acroread crash silently, but it worked. Then Whistler suggested I should use minichinput.

OK, so I get the source code, write an arch build script and... it doesn't compile. Oh, an incorrectly redefined function, that's easy enough to solve. Add a sed command to the build script to remove that useless error causing line, and voila, it compiles.
Install, edit configuration files and xinitrc like the documentation tells me to... easy! And guess what, acroread works again. Try a gtk application... works. Try a qt application... now that doesn't work very well! I can type some other characters, but I can't type "ni" (for those who don't know, that means "you" in chinese). Oh well, that's still better than nothing, and I think qt is to blame for this not chinput.

But wait a minute... all of xfce is in chinese now! Duh, that's what you get for setting the language to chinese. But I can't read chinese that well . Allright, so don't set the language to chinese, only the character set... now chinput sort of half-works. OK, then move things from xinitrc to a separate script, to be run when I actually want to write chinese, instead of always. Doesn't work...

I give up. Back to SCIM...